FAMILY STRUCTURE
Families have long been viewed as the core social unit that maintains 
people's welfare. Over recent decades there have been extensive changes 
in the way that families are structured and function. Research and 
policy interest has shifted from maintaining the so-called ideal or 
traditional family form (a married couple and their children) to 
improving the quality of relationships between family members, 
irrespective of form. Some of this change is also reflective of changing
 demographics - as the population ages and fertility rates have declined
 over the long term, there are more couple only and lone person 
households, regardless of social trends. Other changes in family 
composition represent choices made by family members, including that of 
achieving better functioning family structures. For many members of the 
community, new and emerging forms of family structure represent progress
 in increasing the care, safety and support available to vulnerable 
Australians. Yet, for those members of the community who hold 
traditional values, the decline of traditional family structures may be 
viewed as regress.
In 2006-07, couple families with no children were the most common type 
of family (40%), followed by couple families with dependent children 
(37%). This was the reverse of the situation in 1997 where couple 
families with dependent children were the most common (40%), followed by
 couple families with no children (35%). The increase in the proportion 
of couples living without children partly reflects the ageing of the 
population as baby boomers move into the 'empty nester' phase of their 
lives.
The proportion of one parent families with dependent children remained 
steady, at around 10%, between 1997 and 2006-07. Lone parents are more 
likely to be disadvantaged in a number of areas. They have higher levels
 of unemployment, in part due to caring responsibilities, and are more 
likely to experience financial hardship. Their lone adult circumstances 
also increases the risk of some other forms of disadvantage. For 
example, in the 2006 General Social Survey, people in one parent 
families were victims of an assault (25%) or break-in (17%) at rates 
similar to other lone adult households of comparable age, which is much 
higher than the rates experienced by people in couple families (10% and 
9% respectively). For some, the transition from couple to one parent 
family can result in improvements to the safety, emotional and financial
 circumstances of the individuals involved that outweigh other risks.
The ageing of the population, combined with the fact most women tend to 
marry older men and have longer life expectancies, is reflected in the 
larger number and proportion of older women living alone, compared with 
older men. In 2006-07, women aged 65 years and over were more likely 
than men of the same age to live alone (35% compared with 17%) and women
 aged 85 years and over were more likely to live alone than men of the 
same age (50% compared with 22%). The number of people living alone is 
projected to increase significantly into the future. In 2006, there were
 1.9 million people living alone in Australia; by 2031 it is projected 
that between 3.0 million and 3.6 million people will be living alone 
(ABS 2010a).
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar