FAMILY STRUCTURE
Families have long been viewed as the core social unit that maintains
people's welfare. Over recent decades there have been extensive changes
in the way that families are structured and function. Research and
policy interest has shifted from maintaining the so-called ideal or
traditional family form (a married couple and their children) to
improving the quality of relationships between family members,
irrespective of form. Some of this change is also reflective of changing
demographics - as the population ages and fertility rates have declined
over the long term, there are more couple only and lone person
households, regardless of social trends. Other changes in family
composition represent choices made by family members, including that of
achieving better functioning family structures. For many members of the
community, new and emerging forms of family structure represent progress
in increasing the care, safety and support available to vulnerable
Australians. Yet, for those members of the community who hold
traditional values, the decline of traditional family structures may be
viewed as regress.
In 2006-07, couple families with no children were the most common type
of family (40%), followed by couple families with dependent children
(37%). This was the reverse of the situation in 1997 where couple
families with dependent children were the most common (40%), followed by
couple families with no children (35%). The increase in the proportion
of couples living without children partly reflects the ageing of the
population as baby boomers move into the 'empty nester' phase of their
lives.
The proportion of one parent families with dependent children remained
steady, at around 10%, between 1997 and 2006-07. Lone parents are more
likely to be disadvantaged in a number of areas. They have higher levels
of unemployment, in part due to caring responsibilities, and are more
likely to experience financial hardship. Their lone adult circumstances
also increases the risk of some other forms of disadvantage. For
example, in the 2006 General Social Survey, people in one parent
families were victims of an assault (25%) or break-in (17%) at rates
similar to other lone adult households of comparable age, which is much
higher than the rates experienced by people in couple families (10% and
9% respectively). For some, the transition from couple to one parent
family can result in improvements to the safety, emotional and financial
circumstances of the individuals involved that outweigh other risks.
The ageing of the population, combined with the fact most women tend to
marry older men and have longer life expectancies, is reflected in the
larger number and proportion of older women living alone, compared with
older men. In 2006-07, women aged 65 years and over were more likely
than men of the same age to live alone (35% compared with 17%) and women
aged 85 years and over were more likely to live alone than men of the
same age (50% compared with 22%). The number of people living alone is
projected to increase significantly into the future. In 2006, there were
1.9 million people living alone in Australia; by 2031 it is projected
that between 3.0 million and 3.6 million people will be living alone
(ABS 2010a).
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar